Canadian Science Publishing Senior Investigator Award

Biochemistry and Cell Biology journal

(Merged with the former Genetics Society of Canada Award of Excellence 1976 – 2003; and William F Grant and Peter B Moens Award of Excellence 2004 – 2016)

(Merged with the former Genetics Society of Canada Award of Excellence 1976 – 2003; and William F Grant and Peter B Moens Award of Excellence 2004 – 2016)

This award is offered annually.

The award recognizes Canadian scientists who have demonstrated inclusive excellence across a breadth of activities including research, teaching and mentorship, leadership and outreach.

Note that nominations can be made for the same individual for this award and the Jeanne Manery Fisher Memorial Lecture . If the same nominee is the top ranked candidate in both award categories (CSP & JMF), they must select their preferred award to receive. The next ranked candidate will receive the award in the other category.

(1) Evaluation criteria

Evaluation criteria for CSMB are informed and updated according to best practices and in alignment with Canadian tri-council (NSERC, SSHRC & CIHR) standards.  CSMB also supports the following statement (https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/51732.html) and the DORA principles.

The quality and impact of research cannot be measured through journal publications alone. Research results and outcomes are multifaceted, can reflect multiple types of knowledge and ways of knowing and must be assessed on their own merit. High-quality research outcomes are achieved in many ways, including but not limited to: publishing research articles; reporting new knowledge (such as presenting at conferences and other venues); developing new technologies, producing software and intellectual property; sharing data; contributing to policy decisions; producing highly trained personnel and working in partnership with various sectors of society. Increasingly, funding agencies, research institutions, First Nations, Inuit and MĂ©tis communities, citizens and patients, and researchers themselves, agree on the importance of including a broader set of research outcomes and adopting assessment processes that recognize their value.

The DORA principles are reflected in CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC’s overall approaches to research assessment, and in their shared commitment to continuous improvement in assessment practices. A number of the Agencies’ initiatives and policies support research excellence and align with the recommendations in DORA, including research data management practices, open access publishing, responsible conduct of research, ethical conduct of research involving humans; and the commitment to re-examine research excellence through the Tri-Agency Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Action Plan.

Nominations will be assessed on the following criteria:

  • A record of Excellence in Research – 3 points

Nominees will have evidence of a strong record of research with significant contributions in the field(s) of Biochemistry, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and/or Genetics.

Significant contributions can include (but are not limited to) peer-reviewed publications, presentations, intellectual property, other knowledge translation activities, etc., Awards, degrees, credentials, etc., clinical practice, policy development, specialized training, strategic employment positions, etc.

  • A record of Excellence in Teaching and Mentorship – 3 points

Excellence in teaching and mentorship can include (but is not limited to) evidence of educational leadership (leading significant transformation in teaching and learning at an institutional, disciplinary, community, and/or societal level) as well as effective approaches to inclusive and universal design in teaching and experiential learning. Teaching excellence may also be demonstrated by the creation of exceptional learning environments through inclusive and/or universal design, innovative discipline-specific pedagogies, creative approaches to professional development and mentoring for next generation scientists and activities that maximize learning outcomes for all levels of members of the academy and society.

Taken from criteria for the 3M fellowship, (https://www.stlhe.ca/the-criteria-for-the-3m-fellowship/)).

  • Excellence in Science leadership – 3 points

Evidence for excellence in science leadership can include (but is not limited to) academic leadership in science (as a director, dean, division leader, major project lead, etc.), deep engagement in communities of practice (e.g. science societies at the institutional, regional, national or international level), sustained engagement with policymakers (local, provincial, federal) and decision making bodies (e.g. serving and contributing to boards and councils in a capacity as a scientific leader, serving on advisory committees to government, industry, education, policy-makers in a capacity as an expert scientist, etc.)

  • Outreach – 1 point

Evidence for excellence in outreach can include (but is not limited to) activities that seek to increase a public understanding of science through engagement across any media and mechanism (e.g. books, talks, science fairs, videos, etc.). Excellence in outreach may also be demonstrated by coordinated and sustained engagement and/or leadership in science communication activities, across diverse demographics, and through various media (traditional print/on-line, social media, etc.)

Criteria informed by RCIS https://www.rciscience.ca/the-sandford-fleming-medal-citation

(2) Eligibility

The nominee should be a Canadian citizen or a permanent resident and there are no age restrictions. The nominee must have lived in Canada and have worked at a Canadian research institute (as defined by tri-council institutional eligibility criteria https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_3D5FA603.html)) for the last 10 years in a senior investigator position. The nominee and nominator need not be a member of the CSMB.

(3) Nomination process

It is preferable that the nominator be at an equal or higher professional rank as the nominee. Chairs /Heads /Deans /Presidents are encouraged to nominate members of their faculty for this prestigious award. Self-nominations will also be considered.

Nominations shall consist of

  • a letter from a nominator familiar with the nominee’s work, which summarizes the originality and significance of the nominee’s research and leadership contributions, as well as pertinent biographic data,
  • the nominee’s curriculum vitae.

The awardee will deliver a lecture at the CSMB Annual Conference and submit a manuscript or review of their related work/career path for publication in the journals Biochemistry and Cell Biology or Genome and in the CSMB Bulletin. Awardees are encouraged to become CSMB members.

View key dates for all CSMB awards here

Please address nominations to:

Dr. Tarik Möröy
General Secretary of the CSMB

Nominations should be submitted via the following form:

(updated 2024-02-27)

Previous winners of this award

 

2023 Lori Burrows
2022 Katherine L.B. Borden
2021 Peter L. Davies
2020 Daniel Durocher
2019 Sylvain Moineau
2018 Richard Rachubinski
2017 Sergio Grinstein
2016 Gerry Wright
2015 Michael James
2014 James McGhee
2013 B. Chabot
2012 M. Bouvier
2011 Benjamin J. Blencowe
2009 Hans Vogel
2007 N. Sonenberg
2005 C. Bleackley
2003 V. Ling
2001 F. Doolittle
1999 G. Chaconas
1997 A. J. Pawson
1995 R.S. Hodges
1993 M. Chrétien
1991 J. Riordan
1989 D. Vance
1987 M. Gray
1985 H. Schachter
1984 N. Hozum
1981 M. Smith

 

In 2004, the award was renamed the

William F Grant and Peter B Moens Award of Excellence

 

2016  Verheyen, Esther
2015  Scoles, Graham
2012 Phillips, John
2010  Singh, Rama
2009 Golding, Brian
2008 Singh, Shiva
2007 Sokolowski, Marla
2006 Hegele, Robert
2005  Hilliker, Arthur
2004 Lasko, Paul

 

 

GSC Award of Excellence Winners, first given in 1976

2003 Morgan, Ken
2002 Baillie, David
2001 Hayden, Michael
2000 Culotti, Joseph
1999 Bussey, Howard
1998 Bernstein, Allen
1997 Griffiths, A.J.F.
1996 Walden, D.B.
1995 Cox, D.W.
1994 Kasha, K.
1993 Haynes, R.H.
1992 Scriver, C.R.
1991 Doolittle, W.F.
1990 Tsui, Lap-Chee
1989  Kuspira, J.
1988 Smith, Michael
1987 Kafer, E.
1986  James, A.P.
1985 Moens, P.B.
1984 Chown, B.
1983 von Borstel, R.C.
1982 Person, C.O.
1981 Mortimer, R.K.
1980 Fraser, F.C.
1979 Butler, L.
1978 Fredeen, H.T.
1977 Sears, E.R.
1976 Newcombe, H.B.